--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 10:32 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 10:23 ---
Subject: Bug 27810
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 31 10:23:44 2009
New Revision: 145338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145338
Log:
2009-03-31 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/23401
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-07 12:07 ---
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned
--- Comment #4 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2008-11-20
18:43 ---
Still happens with 4.4.0:
qqq (int a)
{
int result.0;
int D.1236;
int result;
result.0 = bar (a);
result = result.0;
D.1236 = result;
return D.1236;
}
--
dann at godzilla dot ics dot uc
--- Comment #3 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2006-06-20
19:09 ---
More data: for PR8361 the number of functions in the .gimple dump is 5045, the
number of functions in the cleanup_cfg dump is 1341. The majority of the
functions that are eliminated are small functions, fo
--- Comment #2 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2006-05-31
21:47 ---
My guesstimate is that for combine.i about 5-8% of the total number of
expressions
in the gimple dump are due to the gimplification inefficiencies shown in
PRs 27798 27800 27809 27810, so these issues mig
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-29 22:28 ---
Confirmed. IIRC this has do with exceptions though so it might be harder to
fix this.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
