http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26128
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26128
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guen
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-06 01:45 ---
*** Bug 39068 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-12 17:36 ---
*** Bug 32309 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 17:11 ---
*** Bug 29170 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-06 15:00 ---
Actually this is a known regression and a missed optimization regression caused
by fixing up wrong code.
The work around is to use -fwrapv.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
