--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 18:12 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 18:11 ---
Subject: Bug 25513
Author: pinskia
Date: Thu Dec 22 18:11:39 2005
New Revision: 108959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108959
Log:
2005-12-22 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tr
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-22 18:06 ---
Subject: Bug 25513
Author: pinskia
Date: Thu Dec 22 18:06:35 2005
New Revision: 108958
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108958
Log:
2005-12-22 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tr
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 19:40 ---
I have a patch:
===
--- tree-dfa.c (revision 108920)
+++ tree-dfa.c (working copy)
@@ -216,6 +216,9 @@ tree
make_rename_temp (tree type, const char *
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 16:58 ---
lsm needs to special case handling of complex somehow, as we don't take complex
vars to ssa form (appearantly).
(gdb) call debug_generic_expr(stmt)
# t_lsm.21D.1571 = V_MUST_DEF ;
t_lsm.21D.1571 = __complex__ (5.0
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-21 16:27 ---
Confirmed, C testcase (compile at -O1):
int f(void)
{
static _Complex double t;
int i, j;
for(i = 0;i<2;i++)
for(j = 0;j<2;j++)
t = .5 * 1.0;
return t;
}
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org change
