--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 17:01
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #10 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-22 16:56
---
Subject: Bug 24653
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Nov 22 16:56:48 2005
New Revision: 107365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=107365
Log:
PR tree-optimization/24653
* tree-ssa-ccp.c
--- Comment #9 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2005-11-21 14:44 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] EON regressed seriously on x86-64
>
>
> --- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 13:30
> ---
> Fixed at least on the mainline for 4.2.0.
I am going to fix it o
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-21 13:30 ---
Fixed at least on the mainline for 4.2.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-19 01:39
---
It would be a shame not to apply this patch, since it's been approved. Let's
get it applied, and get this closed.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |A
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 07:53 ---
The approved patch is the one at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00212.html
--
bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 14:47 ---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg00195.html
The main reason why DCE is required is that the struct variable is marked as
non TREE_ADDRESSABLE in may_alias.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot o
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 14:40 ---
Confirmed (a patch was posted), the issue is that we need to run DCE before
may_alias before SRA.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 12:58 ---
OK, have new, 100% sure theory ;)
for 4.0 -fno-tree-sra makes important difference, for 4.1 it does not. One
difference is that 4.0 splits startingpoint:
Initial instantiation for startPoint
startPoint.e[2] -> sta
--- Comment #1 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-03 11:40 ---
Actually I cut&pasted wrong BB and the -fno-tree-sra on 4.0 makes the
difference go away, so ignore the huge dumps :)
Let me see if I can work out something better.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
11 matches
Mail list logo
