--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01
14:19 ---
Fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00020.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-01
13:57 ---
Subject: Bug 23604
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-01 13:57:30
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
gcc: C
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-09-30 13:27
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] wrong code due to VRP
On September 30, 2005 09:24, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> 2005-09-30 13:24 --- Jim's patch certainly worked for me. But
> the question is if w
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30 13:24
---
Jim's patch certainly worked for me. But the question is if we can do more.
If not anti-range and limit_vr->min == limit_vr->max, then we at least can
create anti-range from TYPE_MIN_VALUE to TYPE_MAX_VALUE.
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30
13:10 ---
Testing fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23604
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-08-
--- Additional Comments From phython at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-28
20:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=9603)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9603&action=view)
initial patch (untested)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23604
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||phython at gcc dot gnu dot
||org, dnovillo at gcc dot gnu
