--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-17
11:23 ---
*** Bug 23433 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-15
14:53 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From sebastian dot pop at cri dot ensmp dot fr
2005-08-15 12:35 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] Tree checking failure due to scev
Sebastian Pop wrote:
>
> Yes, PR is related to PR19899, but same pattern occured in several
> places and the fix to PR19899 was n
--- Additional Comments From sebastian dot pop at cri dot ensmp dot fr
2005-08-15 12:33 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] Tree checking failure due to scev
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> This is related to PR 19899 which was fixed.
>
Yes, PR is related to PR19899, but same p
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-15
12:26 ---
Subject: Bug 23391
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-08-15 12:26:13
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog Makefile.in tree-chrec.c
--- Additional Comments From sebastian dot pop at cri dot ensmp dot fr
2005-08-15 00:34 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] Tree checking failure due to scev
This patch should fix the problem. There are some more cases that use
build_int_cst instead of build_real. I'll propose a more c
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-15
00:09 ---
This is related to PR 19899 which was fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23391
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-15
00:05 ---
Note that part of the problem is that build_int_cst_type, which scev uses
here, should check that the type given to it is an integral type. That would
have caught the checking failure much earlier. Right
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-15
00:01 ---
Confirmed, only -O1 is required to reproduce this.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
