--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-03 19:58 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-03 19:56 ---
Subject: Bug 23329
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun May 3 19:55:55 2009
New Revision: 147082
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147082
Log:
2009-05-03 Richard Guenther
PR middle-end/23329
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-03 16:13 ---
Mine. I have a patch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assi
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-17
02:48 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-08-11
17:13 ---
I don't think the hack should be removed until a verifier is committed,
otherwise we could still get wrong code for other yet-to-be-fixed cases.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23329
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||22368
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23329
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|22368 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23329
