[Bug tree-optimization/22550] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

2005-07-29 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:38 --- Fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01971.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22550] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

2005-07-29 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-29 16:32 --- Subject: Bug 22550 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-29 16:32:01 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-cfgcleanup.c

[Bug tree-optimization/22550] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

2005-07-26 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 20:23 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The other issue is cleanup CFG is not doing its job really, well really its full job. > No. CFG cleanup is not prepared to handle the consequences of copy/const propagation. As

[Bug tree-optimization/22550] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

2005-07-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-18 15:16 --- The other issue is cleanup CFG is not doing its job really, well really its full job. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22550

[Bug tree-optimization/22550] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vrp_evaluate_conditional

2005-07-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-18 15:14 --- Confirmed, VRP is not allowing an INTEGER_CST in a condtional expression. -- What|Removed |Added -