--- Additional Comments From belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru
2005-09-10 13:03 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> A regression hunt on powerpc-linux shows that the test case starts failing
> with this patch from rakdver:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-07/msg00181.html
so
--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-09 01:00
---
A regression hunt on powerpc-linux shows that the test case starts failing
with this patch from rakdver:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-07/msg00181.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-18
09:44 ---
Probably the same as PR 22438.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22516
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-17
08:09 ---
Confirmed, backtrace:
#0 0x0010c034 in is_gimple_variable (t=0x0) at ../../gcc/tree-gimple.c:239
#1 0x0010c70c in is_gimple_val (t=0x0) at ../../gcc/tree-gimple.c:366
#2 0x0012bd94 in force_gimple_operand
