https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22401
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
This is now threaded by threadfull2:
Checking profitability of path (backwards): bb:3 (2 insns) bb:2
Control statement insns: 2
Overall: 0 insns
path: 2->3->xx REJECTED
Checking profitability of path (ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22401
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22401
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3 fr
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-05
04:22 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> DOM seems to be innocent here.
Hmm, VRP gets it correct, in that there are no warnings for the following code:
void __show_backtrace(void *rw)
{
if (rw == 0) return;
L0:;
i
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-
--- Additional Comments From hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-15
09:58 ---
DOM seems to be innocent here. Before DOM the header is copied and DOM notice
that loop
is infinite when entered. There is no sane way to represent infinite loop in
profile
(ie it's frequency would have
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
