--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||GC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-26 23:48 ---
Yes, it did, for more than a week now, after being hidden for 2 weeks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26
23:29 ---
Why "definitely not fixed"? You weren't so sure in comment #7. Did the
failure re-surface for you now?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-17 19:49 ---
Definitely not fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIR
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-10
18:34 ---
So closing as fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |
--- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2005-07-09 17:50 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
>
> --- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-09 17:15
> ---
> I can't reproduce it any more. Whether it's gone dormant again or fixed for
> rea
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-07-09 17:15 ---
I can't reproduce it any more. Whether it's gone dormant again or fixed for
real I don't know.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-09
16:40 ---
Does this work now?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot |
|org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22216
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-28 14:18
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:42:03PM -, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> > Are you sure?
>
> Yes.
>
You need to check your script then. The patch for 21959 h
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28
13:29 ---
Looking at the backtrace, it looks more like one of Honza's patches rather than
the patch for PR21959.
On more likely the following patch (as I got a clean bootstrap on
powerpc-darwin with no problems
bef
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-28 12:52
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:42:03PM -, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> $1 = {name = 0x0, gate = 0,
> execute = @0x41013990: 0x40b569d0 ,
>
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-06-28 12:42 ---
> Are you sure?
Yes.
> Show me '*pass'?
$1 = {name = 0x0, gate = 0,
execute = @0x41013990: 0x40b569d0 ,
sub = 0x0, next = 0x0, static_pass_number = -1, tv_id = 116,
properties_requ
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at redhat dot com 2005-06-28 12:16
---
Subject: Re: New: [4.1 regression] ICE during GC
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 11:52:20AM -, schwab at suse dot de wrote:
> Broken by patch from PR21959.
>
Are you sure? Kenner seemed to get good results fro
15 matches
Mail list logo
