https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21643
Gilbie Rivas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rivasgilbie121 at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21643
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21643
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-31
08:45:35 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 31 08:45:27 2012
New Revision: 193028
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193028
Log:
PR tree-optimization/19105
PR t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21643
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||46309
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski
--- Additional Comments From trt at acm dot org 2005-05-18 17:28 ---
Here is a equivalent case that gcc also misses (but beyond scope of
fold-const.c). By the way, since there is a missing final return, can't gcc just
simplify all three functions into "return 1;" :-)
int fish3(unsigned c
--- Additional Comments From trt at acm dot org 2005-05-18 17:21 ---
This is because fold-const.c only does ad-hoc re-association.
Here is an example for fold_truthop (approx line 8805)
/* Check for the possibility of merging component references. If our
lhs is another si
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
12:38 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at
