[Bug tree-optimization/21638] [4.1 regression] ADDR_EXPR invariancy not recomputed

2005-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-05 07:56 --- *** Bug 21780 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21638] [4.1 regression] ADDR_EXPR invariancy not recomputed

2005-05-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-24 15:57 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/21638] [4.1 regression] ADDR_EXPR invariancy not recomputed

2005-05-20 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-20 09:54 --- A patch was posted by Richard Sandiford: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg02029.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21638

[Bug tree-optimization/21638] [4.1 regression] ADDR_EXPR invariancy not recomputed

2005-05-19 Thread hp at bitrange dot com
--- Additional Comments From hp at bitrange dot com 2005-05-19 14:07 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ADDR_EXPR invariancy not recomputed On Thu, 19 May 2005, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote: > --- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-19 > 10:10 --

[Bug tree-optimization/21638] [4.1 regression] ADDR_EXPR invariancy not recomputed

2005-05-19 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-19 10:10 --- HP: people are expected to provide preprocessed source code even for bootstrap failures, let alone unified source tree builds for fancy platforms. This very bug shows how providing a preprocessed source mad