--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-15 19:14 ---
Fixed on the mainline now (I don't know what by).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-09 03:45 ---
Referring to comment #2, the test-case for PR 24750 has a few similar loops and
a few other PR references that seems relevant.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20656
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-08 00:30 ---
Seen at test-case reduction also for code of the form:
int i; for (i = 1; i <= shift_size; i++) { }
not producing the same ICE as for:
int i; i = 1 <= shift_size ? shift_size : 1;
(I'll put a pointer here to the complete
--
Bug 20656 depends on bug 22325, which changed state.
Bug 22325 Summary: missed optimization in loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22325
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-06
18:50 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
