https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh the TREE_OVERFLOW part was fixed much earlier than that though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to work|4.7.1
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-15
02:59 ---
Confirmed, now that TREE_OVERFLOW should not matter, we should change how we
dump out
INTEGER_CST whos TREE_OVERFLOW is set.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-16
15:02 ---
Yes this is because TREE_OVERFLOW is set.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
