[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2023-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 Bug 20083 depends on bug 89263, which changed state. Bug 89263 Summary: Simplify bool expression to OR https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89263 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2023-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2023-06-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae commit r14-1597-g64d90d06d2db43538c8a45adbb3d74842f7868ae Author: Andrew Pinski Date: Wed

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2023-06-06 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Patch submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620829.html

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2023-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||89263 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2023-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 Bug 20083 depends on bug 96923, which changed state. Bug 96923 Summary: Failure to optimize a select-related bool pattern to or+not https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96923 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2021-06-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||96923 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2020-01-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Take f4, if we compile with -O1 -fno-tree-sink, you will see the behavior we get for f.

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2020-01-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Here is another testcase which should produce the same code: int f3(int i, int j, int l) { int t = i | j; _Bool t1 = l != 0; _Bool t2 = t ? 1 : t1; return t2; } int f4(int i, int j, int l) { int t

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2012-01-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20083 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/20083] Missed optimization with conditional and basically ||

2005-02-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-22 18:27 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E