--- Additional Comments From andrewhutchinson at cox dot net 2005-01-30
04:58 ---
Subject: Re: Poor optimisation of loop test
I am not sure what makes you think that. Compare with ZERO is
invariabley cheaper than compare with "n".
The former is "free" sign status following any conditi
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-30
03:17 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hmm, on most targets it is true that != is the same case as >=.
s/case/cost/.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19703
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-30
03:17 ---
Hmm, on most targets it is true that != is the same case as >=.
--
What|Removed |Added
