--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-29 05:23 ---
The first example is fixed so closing as fixed, the second example I think has
been fixed seperately already.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21
05:44 ---
Note we are unrolling this loop now so that should help SPEC.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18813
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06
04:58 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||rakdver at
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-03
19:51 ---
Oh, the problem is we don't handle non one increment.
Another example:
int f(unsigned s1, unsigned s2, int *s, int *e)
{
unsigned i;
for (i = s1; i< s2; i+=4)
*s++ = 0;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
