--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-09
14:44 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOL
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07
19:51 ---
Subject: Bug 18403
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-07 19:51:26
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog Makefile.in tree-chrec.c tr
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2005-03-31 12:58
---
Another testcase that exhibits a similar problem: vect-5.f90
(patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg02840.html)
On powerpc64-linux (lp64) the second loop is not vectorized because the data-
refer
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2005-01-09 16:35
---
vect-[46,50,52,58,60] don't fail anymore, and vect-[77,78] xfail on vectorizing
for lp62 targets, so I think we can classify this PR as missed-optimization
only, or close it and open a new (missed-optimizatio
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2004-11-23 19:48
---
just for the record - related comments from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
patches/2004-11/msg01394.html:
"
> > A question: how would you write a testcase that when compiled on
powerpc*
> > the dg-final check xfail
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-23
09:19 ---
Subject: Bug 18403
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-23 09:19:25
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog tree-vectorizer.c
Log mes
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-20
18:26 ---
> Testcase pr18425.c can't be vectorized with -m64 because there's no vector
> support for 64bit elements. This testcase should also xfail (not temporarily)
> when -m64 is used or if the compiler is conf
--- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2004-11-16
17:06 ---
GCC for powerpc64-*-linux* could be any of the following: (a) a compiler that
generates only LP64 code; (b) a biarch compiler that generates ILP32 code by
default; or (c) a biarch compiler that generates LP6
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2004-11-16 12:47
---
Testcases vect-[77,77a,78].c don't get vectorized with -m64 because the access
function that the evolution analyzer returns for the pointers in these loops
looks like the following:
ib_16 + (aint *) ((long un
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2004-11-16 12:14
---
patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg01301.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18403
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-15
22:31 ---
*** Bug 18505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2004-11-15 18:53
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> At least on powerpc-darwin (with -m64) we now vectorize these loops but we
ICE because we have:
> pointer_type + int_type which is not valid and is even worse on 64bit targets
as in
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-15
02:34 ---
At least on powerpc-darwin (with -m64) we now vectorize these loops but we ICE
because we have:
pointer_type + int_type which is not valid and is even worse on 64bit targets
as int is 32 bit so we try to
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
17:55 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gc
14 matches
Mail list logo
