[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2005-06-04 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-04 17:00 --- 21855 has some analysis. Better use that one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21855 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2005-04-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-13 18:06 --- Now the problem is that we don't remove the extra load of a->length because of aliasing. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2005-02-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 22:01 --- Suspending as fixed and moving the target milestone to 4.1.0 so we know to retest it when tcb gets merged in. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2005-02-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 22:00 --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Fix. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01074.html. > > For 4.0 ? No, but for 4.1, reopening as there is no 4.1 right now. --

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2005-02-18 Thread schlie at comcast dot net
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-18 21:57 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Fix. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01074.html. For 4.0 ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18178

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2005-02-18 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 21:44 --- Fix. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01074.html. The patch allows VRP to eliminate 42% more conditionals on cc1-i-files and 173% more conditionals on DLV. But produces little difference in

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2005-02-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-18 21:29 --- Subject: Bug 18178 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: tree-cleanup-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-18 21:28:58 Modified files: gcc: C

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2005-02-08 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-08 21:07 --- We have this hunk in the .vrp dump: # BLOCK 1 # PRED: 4 (true,exec) :; iD.1901_30 = iD.1901_1; D.1909_31 = D.1909_4; i.0D.1911_5 = (unsigned intD.6) iD.1901_30; D.1909_6 = D.1909_31; D

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2005-02-08 Thread dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2004-10-28 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 14:24 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2004-10-27 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu dot ||org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug tree-optimization/18178] Missed opportunity for removing bounds checking

2004-10-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 14:15 --- The tree level looks like after optimization: t.f(int[]) (this, a) { int i; int D.385; unsigned int i.3; int D.376; : D.376 = a->length; if (D.376 <= 0) goto ; else goto ; :; i = 0; :; i.3