[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-31 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-31 18:51 --- *** Bug 18258 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 03:03 --- Subject: Bug 17529 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 03:03:48 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-cfg.c gcc/tes

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-27 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 02:52 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-24 01:09 --- New simpler patch: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-24 01:00 --- The other patch will be put on hold for 4.1 (I will create a branch to contain this patch and other patches which are needed for that patch). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17529

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-24 00:59 --- I have a simple patch which just calls fold_stmt on the ASM_EXPR to fold *&a. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-18 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-18 16:48 --- Looks like you reverted the patch but not the testcase which now fails. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17529

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-17 22:53 --- The patch fixes this regressions but causes other because some of the infrastructor in GCC rejects &variable[0] is not a constant when it is. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-17 22:02 --- I reverted the patch which fixed this so reopening. -- What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-17 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-17 17:25 --- Subject: Bug 17529 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-17 17:25:00 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog Added files: gcc/t

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-17 17:24 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 14:52 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 14:42 --- Yes it is the same bug (or at least a related one). The testcase I gave only fails yesterday between the time I patched remove_useless_statement and revert that patch because it caused other problems. Th

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-15 Thread amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From amacleod at redhat dot com 2004-10-15 14:31 --- Is it the same bug? I have a compiler from oct 7th, and the original testcase fails as advertised, but the new one you have supplied appears to compile fine with it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 12:55 --- I have a fix for the C front-end (the C++ front-end already works). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17529

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 01:21 --- I think I have a fix. I will submit it once I test it. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

2004-10-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 01:20 --- Here is reduced testcase, it has nothing to do with asm at all: static inline void bar (const int *const x) { int x1 = *x; } static const int y[1]={0}; void foo (void) { bar (y); } -- What