--- Comment #24 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 15:07
---
But that is not related to the orginal bug.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #23 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 10:08
---
Dirk, you may want to take this one, too.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-08 10:07
---
Doesn't really work, it misses support for STRING_CST. See PR22303.
static const char *foo = "?";
char foobar () { return foo[0]; }
Something like the following should fix it (once fold_read_from_constant_strin
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-05-08 21:30
---
Just checked in a patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-08
21:22 ---
Subject: Bug 14841
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-08 21:22:21
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog Makefile.in tree-ssa-ccp.c
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-05-07 05:12
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I've extended Steven's patch to handle nested aggregates
> (i.e. any combination of ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF).
Does it also work with terminating static const char "strings" which
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-05-07 03:08
---
I've extended Steven's patch to handle nested aggregates
(i.e. any combination of ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF).
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--
Bug 14841 depends on bug 17046, which changed state.
Bug 17046 Summary: An unused array is not optimized away.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17046
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Last reconfirmed|2004-12-03 0
