https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120331
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-May/683999.html
There was no regressions with this version of the patch and the issue I found
was solved too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #61460|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120331
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Created attachment 61460 [details]
> Patch which I am testing
It has one regression though: gcc.dg/builtins-61.c .
That is due to this pattern:
/* cexp(x+yi)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120331
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 61460
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61460&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120331
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think I have a patch to do this. It undoes the push but only if there is one
statement in the sequence. Though we could extend it later on.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120331
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|useless NON_LVALUE not |match causes an extra