https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6eb92973ea308e248ce23927a9ac58ef81ee7a2
commit r16-1201-gc6eb92973ea308e248ce23927a9ac58ef81ee7a2
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a80eaefd93c2f1f7c9b71dbc1b97783214b7b2f
commit r16-1202-g4a80eaefd93c2f1f7c9b71dbc1b97783214b7b2f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I'll also note that as written the table-based lookup has a value of 31 for
zero input but lzcnt will get you 32. So unless you make the input of zero
undefined by guarding the code (thus provide a value-r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
And to avoid repeated scanning of DECL_INITIAL when we add more of these
patterns we could record classification of the table in a custom
internal decl attribute we add, __attribute__(("table kind"(int)))
w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I'll note that we might want to match
31 - clz (val)
aka the table lookup, not 31 - table_lookup, as that will better in
case the result is offset by a constant or a variable where the latter
would even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120032
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Severity|normal