https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee30e2586a3142e63daaf301a561984f1d22d38d
commit r15-7665-gee30e2586a3142e63daaf301a561984f1d22d38d
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[15 regression] Miscompile |[15 regression] Miscompile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #8)
> Sorry about that. It doesn't always hang because of uninit memory.
>
> With Valgrind, I got r15-1757-g4d24159a1fcb15. Does that sound more
> reasonable?
Maybe.
F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Valgrind might dectect the removal of the stores. I am not 100% sure though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
DSE4 shows:
```
Deleted dead store: g[1] = 8;
Deleted dead store: g[0] = 5;
```
But as I mentioned the problem is in pcom which is forming an invalid pointer
in the first place.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I can (with -fno-ssp), so bisecting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118954
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Miscompile at -O3 |[15 regression] Miscompile
14 matches
Mail list logo