https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/or8y4owvoc@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to andi from comment #7)
> If it's solvable for the sanitizers then it's solvable for abort too
sanitizers expand to use the location before RTL cross jumping. It is solvable
but do we want to. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198
--- Comment #7 from andi at firstfloor dot org ---
If it's solvable for the sanitizers then it's solvable for abort too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andi Kleen from comment #4)
> Actually assuming the culprit is tail-merge it already has a black list of
> functions it won't merge:
It is not just tail-merge but also RTL cross jumping. And th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118198
ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ak at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever c
