https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
In fact I wonder how the code would support any case where the VUSE on the
later load isn't the same as the VUSE on the first load.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10)
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
> >
> > --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
>
> --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
> Created attachment 59825
> --> https:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> I am suspecting this comes from a benchmark, do you have the name of the
> benchmark?
Nope, it got reported to me with just exactly this testcase ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am suspecting this comes from a benchmark, do you have the name of the
benchmark?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59825
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59825&action=edit
Fix
Note this includes debugging still and no testcases. And has only done some
quick testing on the testcases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #59823|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Confirmed. Hmm, phiprop2 can handle it though; that is
> -fdisable-tree-phiprop1 and see that phiprop2 handles it.
>
> I have not looked into why yet.
That is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like exceptions. That is for my reduced testcase adding -fno-exceptions
works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117965
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 59823
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59823&action=edit
reduced testcase
Add -DWORKS and phiprop works.
That is the call before clamp is causing issues. (maybe vops
13 matches
Mail list logo