[Bug tree-optimization/117895] [15 regression] ICE in operand_subword_force since r15-5850-g4d2b9202fe94c5

2024-12-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117895 --- Comment #6 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:42d84ba5db65f6cf8e2bd5e8bfd8ca8c8240734b commit r15-5996-g42d84ba5db65f6cf8e2bd5e8bfd8ca8c8240734b Author: Jeff Law Date: Fri Dec 6 1

[Bug tree-optimization/117895] [15 regression] ICE in operand_subword_force since r15-5850-g4d2b9202fe94c5

2024-12-06 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117895 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/117895] [15 regression] ICE in operand_subword_force since r15-5850-g4d2b9202fe94c5

2024-12-03 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117895 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Looks like another mode problem, probably more than one left in this code. While I've got a change that fixes this particular failure, I'll need to do some wider testing.

[Bug tree-optimization/117895] [15 regression] ICE in operand_subword_force since r15-5850-g4d2b9202fe94c5

2024-12-03 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117895 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A

[Bug tree-optimization/117895] [15 regression] ICE in operand_subword_force since r15-5850-g4d2b9202fe94c5

2024-12-03 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117895 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-12-03 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/117895] [15 regression] ICE in operand_subword_force since r15-5850-g4d2b9202fe94c5

2024-12-03 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117895 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- > Ugh. libgo + sparc + solaris 2. Hopefully I can find a way to reproduce > this. Shouldn't be too hard these days: the cfarm has a Solaris

[Bug tree-optimization/117895] [15 regression] ICE in operand_subword_force since r15-5850-g4d2b9202fe94c5

2024-12-03 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117895 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Ugh. libgo + sparc + solaris 2. Hopefully I can find a way to reproduce this.

[Bug tree-optimization/117895] [15 regression] ICE in operand_subword_force since r15-5850-g4d2b9202fe94c5

2024-12-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117895 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/117895] [15 regression] ICE in operand_subword_force

2024-12-03 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117895 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0