[Bug tree-optimization/116338] GCC is not vectoring TSVC s255 while clang can

2024-08-20 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116338 --- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > You can try to see whether adding a SSA copy would make this supported, it > seems not allowing a PHI is simply a missed feature. We now fail in /*

[Bug tree-optimization/116338] GCC is not vectoring TSVC s255 while clang can

2024-08-20 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116338 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- You can try to see whether adding a SSA copy would make this supported, it seems not allowing a PHI is simply a missed feature.

[Bug tree-optimization/116338] GCC is not vectoring TSVC s255 while clang can

2024-08-20 Thread kugan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116338 --- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > The issue is the recurrence > >[local count: 10737416]: > x_10 = b[31999]; > y_11 = b[31998]; > >[local count: 1063004408]: > # x_18 =

[Bug tree-optimization/116338] GCC is not vectoring TSVC s255 while clang can

2024-08-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116338 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- The issue is the recurrence [local count: 10737416]: x_10 = b[31999]; y_11 = b[31998]; [local count: 1063004408]: # x_18 = PHI <_1(5), x_10(2)> # y_19 = PHI _1 = b[i_20]; .. [local co

[Bug tree-optimization/116338] GCC is not vectoring TSVC s255 while clang can

2024-08-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116338 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-08-12 Ever confirmed|0