https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
>
> --- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Well, the shuffling in .LOAD_LANES will be a bit awkward to do, but sure. We
> basically lack "constant folding" of .LOAD_LANES and similarly of course
> we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Well, the shuffling in .LOAD_LANES will be a bit awkward to do, but sure. We
basically lack "constant folding" of .LOAD_LANES and similarly of course
we can't see through .STORE_LANES of a constant when la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Oh VN does have some knowledge of MASK_STORE and LEN_STORE. Just not
> LOAD_LANES .
>
>
> See PR 106365 for MASK_STORE and LEN_STORE implementation. Shouldn'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114345
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
