[Bug tree-optimization/114072] gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs

2024-05-23 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/114072] gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs

2024-05-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Rainer Orth : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fc5e109272977f0242a2ceee3a85765cdbed1993 commit r15-789-gfc5e109272977f0242a2ceee3a85765cdbed1993 Author: Rainer Orth Date: Thu Ma

[Bug tree-optimization/114072] gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs

2024-05-22 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 22 May 2024, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 > > --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

[Bug tree-optimization/114072] gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs

2024-05-22 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- [...] >> I think the best we can do then is >> >> /* { dg-skip-if "PR tree-optimization/114072" { be && { ! vect_shift_char } >> } }

[Bug tree-optimization/114072] gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs

2024-05-22 Thread rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 22 May 2024, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 > > --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE>

[Bug tree-optimization/114072] gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs

2024-05-22 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- > Hmm, is solaris-sparc big-endian? It seems so. That makes the bitfield It is indeed. > access require a VnQImode logical right shift (but

[Bug tree-optimization/114072] gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs

2024-05-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, is solaris-sparc big-endian? It seems so. That makes the bitfield access require a VnQImode logical right shift (but little-endian doesn't require it - it's actually bitfield endianess that matters).

[Bug tree-optimization/114072] gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c FAILs

2024-05-22 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114072 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- Richard, any suggestion on how to handle this? There are 3 instances of "not vectorized" in the dump: /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-pr111779.c:29:23: missed: not vectorized: r