[Bug tree-optimization/113614] wrong code with _BitInt() division at -O1

2024-01-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113614 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/113614] wrong code with _BitInt() division at -O1

2024-01-27 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113614 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a12b0e9360e88fceb0414bfb34c8c1ad87c5ac90 commit r14-8468-ga12b0e9360e88fceb0414bfb34c8c1ad87c5ac90 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: S

[Bug tree-optimization/113614] wrong code with _BitInt() division at -O1

2024-01-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113614 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/113614] wrong code with _BitInt() division at -O1

2024-01-26 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113614 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess the thing is that while using for a signed operand a positive precision (if smaller than the precision of the signed operand) is always fine, indicating zero extension from something narrower, for un