https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7cbe41d35e6a60776484e04e42e408de9fc82954
commit r14-7115-g7cbe41d35e6a60776484e04e42e408de9fc82954
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #11 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #10)
> Hi,
>
> It's not forgotten. I've agreed on a fix with the maintainers that should
> solve a bunch of other (older) issues with copysign as well.
>
> S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #10 from Tamar Christina ---
Hi,
It's not forgotten. I've agreed on a fix with the maintainers that should solve
a bunch of other (older) issues with copysign as well.
Since it's a bug fix it's on my list after my stage3 changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #7)
> testing patch
A month later: any update on that?
I didn't see a patch posted, so perhaps there was more work to it.
Please leave a note if you're no long
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 112945 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|moxie-elf |moxie-elf, cris-elf,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #3)
> Hmm I rather think PHI ops should handle that null like other passes do. The
> folding is supposed to already test and only happen if it succeeds.
It handles
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
new_stmt = build_call_internal (ifn, res_op);
static gcall *
build_call_internal (internal_fn fn, gimple_match_op *res_op)
{
if (direct_internal_fn_p (fn))
{
tree_pair types = direct_internal_fn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112468
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
15 matches
Mail list logo
