[Bug tree-optimization/109931] Knowledge on literal not used in optimization

2023-05-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109931 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- There is another bug about this. In this case we know that bit 5 is set for the range ['a','z'] .

[Bug tree-optimization/109931] Knowledge on literal not used in optimization

2023-05-22 Thread antoshkka at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109931 --- Comment #3 from Antony Polukhin --- > But that's because nothing in the function asserts this? Without fully > specializing and unrolling on the constant "hello" argument at least. Yes, I was hoping for that unrolling to happen Probably a

[Bug tree-optimization/109931] Knowledge on literal not used in optimization

2023-05-22 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109931 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/109931] Knowledge on literal not used in optimization

2023-05-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109931 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- But that's because nothing in the function asserts this? Without fully specializing and unrolling on the constant "hello" argument at least.