https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106989
--- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> The DSE happens but only at the RTL level
Is it a good idea to do data-ref in DSE and remove the first redundant store?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106989
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The DSE happens but only at the RTL level
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106989
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
/app/example.cpp:20:25: note: Detected interleaving store a[i_27] and a[i_27]
/app/example.cpp:20:25: note: Queuing group with duplicate access for fixup
/app/example.cpp:20:25: note: zero step in oute
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106989
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
> real_t* __restrict__ xx;
> real_t* yy;
> real_t s243(void)
> {
> for (int nl = 0; nl < iterations; nl++) {
> for (int i = 0; i < LEN_1D-1; i++) {
> a[i] = b[i] + c[i ] * d[i];
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106989
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
Keywords|
