https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104408
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> > match.pd just does canonicalization here. SLP discovery could handle this
> > in the existing swap operands
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104408
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> match.pd just does canonicalization here. SLP discovery could handle this
> in the existing swap operands or reassoc support but I guess the desire here
> is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104408
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104408
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104408
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104408
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
In particular, the rewrite should probably be gated on the expression being
single use.
