[Bug tree-optimization/102436] [11/12 Regression] Lost Load/Store Motion

2021-11-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102436 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.1, 12.0 Known to fail|

[Bug tree-optimization/102436] [11/12 Regression] Lost Load/Store Motion

2021-11-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102436 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0fc859f5efcb4624a8b4ffdbf34d63972af179a8 commit r12-5394-g0fc859f5efcb4624a8b4ffdbf34d63972af179a8 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/102436] [11/12 Regression] Lost Load/Store Motion

2021-11-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102436 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- So what can probably be special-cased is when all stores in the loop happen in the same basic-block. I do have a start for this but need to massage it a bit more. Once there's more than one block controll

[Bug tree-optimization/102436] [11/12 Regression] Lost Load/Store Motion

2021-09-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102436 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|---