https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66046
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66046
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu May 7 14:44:26 2015
New Revision: 222878
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222878&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/66046
* c-c++-common/ubsan/align-6.c: Don'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66046
--- Comment #5 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Oops. Let me prepare a patch. But I won't be able to test -- are you
> willing to test it once I have something?. If it passes both x86_64, I'll
> just commi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66046
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
"both x86_64 and arm"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66046
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66046
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Gribov ---
The question is what's more appropriate. Doing this repetative work like this
demotivates folks. But if Marek promises to never add newlines to his regexps
again we can submit another cleanup patch :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66046
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
