https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64885
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Simply including first (as suggested in PR 64883 comment 10)
causes a different error, because the gthr headers don't have #pragma GCC
system_header and so the way uses __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT causes a
warni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64885
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64885
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That's a bug in gthr-single.h
--- a/libgcc/gthr-single.h
+++ b/libgcc/gthr-single.h
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ typedef int __gthread_recursive_mutex_t;
#define __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION(mx)
#define __GTHREAD_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64885
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Related to (duplicate of) pr64883.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64885
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64885
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 34633
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34633&action=edit
gzipped pre-processed source of testcase
