--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-14 04:42
---
Fixed.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-13 19:42 ---
Subject: Bug 39733
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Apr 13 19:42:26 2009
New Revision: 146009
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=146009
Log:
2009-04-13 H.J. Lu
PR testsuite/39733
* gcc.misc-
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-04-13 17:21 ---
The patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg00852.html
fixes PR39749.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39733
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-13 15:12 ---
*** Bug 39749 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39733
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-13 13:30 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> HJ, can you please show verbose log output from the failed tests that proves
> that this bug and the other one are indeed duplicates? I don't see why on
> GNU/Linux, as should fail when pa
--- Comment #5 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-13 13:17 ---
HJ, can you please show verbose log output from the failed tests that proves
that this bug and the other one are indeed duplicates? I don't see why on
GNU/Linux, as should fail when passed --help
--
http://gcc.gn
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-13 13:11 ---
*** Bug 39749 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-11 01:06 ---
Confirmed, please stop setting the target milestone unless the bug is a
regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39733
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-11 01:05 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-04/msg00852.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-11 00:55 ---
The problem is both lib/options.exp and gcc.misc-tests/options.exp
define check_for_options. But they take different parameters and are
different. gcc.misc-tests/help.exp has
load_lib options.exp
But you really do
11 matches
Mail list logo