--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-15 18:49
---
> Are there any objections to calling this fixed, based on the committed patch
> referenced in comment #2?
Apparently not.
Let's call this bug fixed.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
Wha
--- Comment #5 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-14 00:17 ---
Are there any objections to calling this fixed, based on the committed patch
referenced in comment #2?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26813
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-06 21:04
---
> Does the ICE message get translated for different locales?
Yes, see e.g. the results from the testcase from comment #3 of PR 26155
below. That shouldn't impact the testsuite AFAIK, because the dg-error
markers r
--- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-06 20:48 ---
Gosh, I don't remember ever seeing this stuff about new exit codes for ICEs. I
can rethink how the testsuite detects them, now that we know where to look.
Does the ICE message get translated for different locales?
--- Comment #2 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-06 19:30
---
Janis went for the second approach:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-06/msg00324.html
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-22 21:00 ---
Confirmed, I was going to link the llibjava testing bug but you already found
it :).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26813
