https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
> I don't see any of the FAILs or XFAILs listed in comment #0 with cross
> compilers for any of the Targets. Can this report be resolved?
The fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> I don't see any of the FAILs or XFAILs listed in comment #0 with cross
> compilers for any of the Targets. Can this report be resolved?
I thinks so, now we only ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
> I'm seeing it on 64-bit sparc, and there are also reports for
> s390x-ibm-linux-gnu and m68k-unknown-linux-gnu. It may be a
> coincidance, but those are all big-endian targets.
There seems to be a miss opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
> The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e560abff4294639a0fcf666994c30fb2f00a324
>
> commit r12-4839-g2e560
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e560abff4294639a0fcf666994c30fb2f00a324
commit r12-4839-g2e560abff4294639a0fcf666994c30fb2f00a324
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu Oct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102944
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
