https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
--- Comment #15 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #14)
> Should be fixed now.
Thanks you for fixing this, and the CFI issues you've been working through.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f9190a1c6d001099d1409298ae3b684499bd1fdd
commit r12-4714-gf9190a1c6d001099d1409298ae3b684499bd1fdd
Author: Sandra Loosemore
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72dc270be793f159a3a038bef41542d85550b331
commit r12-4691-g72dc270be793f159a3a038bef41542d85550b331
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
--- Comment #11 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-October/056807.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 05:05:26PM +, sandra at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
>
> --- Comment #9 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> I will rewrite this te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
--- Comment #9 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I will rewrite this testcase not to use alloca.
This particular case was originally XFAIL'ed at runtime because the
functionality it was supposed to test (assumed-length character
interoperabilit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus ---
I wonder whether something likewise (using __builtin_alloca) should also be
done in libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-gwv-2.c, which
currently uses
"#include " + "alloca".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn ---
Sandra checked in a large number of testcases for interoperability that were
broken from the outset on all platforms -- I saw them failing on multiple Linux
architectures, not just AIX. The testcases should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #5)
> Previously the test case was unresolved because it referenced alloca without
> a declaration.
>
> char *adata = (char *) alloca (n);
>
> If you want
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje.gcc at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 05:28:08AM +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
> I think the following is better:
>
> #ifndef alloca
> #define alloca __builtin_alloca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102910
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|fortran
14 matches
Mail list logo