[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58a12b0eadac62e691fcf7325ab2bc2c93d46b61 commit r11-6381-g58a12b0eadac62e691fcf7325ab2bc2c93d46b61 Author: Richard Sandiford D

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-30 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška --- > which is miscompiled at -O2 -ftree-vectorize or -O3. What a great reduction, can you please share knowledge how did you achieve that?!

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #10 from Alex Coplan --- Reduced to: int c = 1705; char a; long f = 50887638; unsigned long long *h(unsigned long long *k, unsigned long long *l) { return *k ? k : l; } void aa() {} int main() { long d = f; for (char g = 0; g <

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- Btw. how powerful machine do you use for reduction? What's a wall time of an interestingness test you're going to use?

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-16 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #7 from Alex Coplan --- Thanks, I can reproduce it now.

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49777 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49777&action=edit Packed yarpgen test-case

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan --- Can't repro with that seed (at least on aarch64-elf-gcc). I expect we're seeing different source files. I see: $ md5sum src/* 72fdf911a2c5f9cc21df5af3ffb4726e src/driver.cpp b8fdebf50f579fa5d7c93de5d42ae217

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #3) > Hi Martin, can you post the yarpgen seed (or the original cpp files) and I > will have a go at reproducing/reducing? Sure, it's 202213617. Thank you for help.

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-16 Thread acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-15 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49772 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49772&action=edit test case 2

[Bug target/98302] [11 Regression] Wrong code on aarch64

2020-12-15 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98302 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 49771 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49771&action=edit test-case 1