https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #31 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d29d0d630caac54dbcc6c3fb961258a011a30fc
commit r9-9497-g3d29d0d630caac54dbcc6c3fb961258a011a30fc
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #30 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c85bc938ccf75ea45c00e430f715544ff396e5b5
commit r10-9196-gc85bc938ccf75ea45c00e430f715544ff396e5b5
Author: Iain Sandoe
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #29 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #28)
> The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1352bc88a0525743c952197fb2db6e4f8c091cde
>
> commit r11-5758-g1352bc88a0525743c9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #28 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1352bc88a0525743c952197fb2db6e4f8c091cde
commit r11-5758-g1352bc88a0525743c952197fb2db6e4f8c091cde
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe ---
tomorrow if there are no further comments (the patch needs minor typographical
changes).
I'm also testing back-ports for the open branches, and will publish
Darwin-specific branches at least for gcc-7.5 (and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #26 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Any news? I did not test the patch you posted in your last comment, but only
the one from your git repo. Under the assumption that this is identical to the
patch here, it works. So apparently libfortran and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
--- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #24 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #22)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #16)
> > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> > > > (In reply to Jü
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #23 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #18)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #17)
> -
>
> * I found that there was one incorrect case in libgfortran (where there is a
> direct reference to **env
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> > > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #14)
>
>
> > clang: erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #16)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #14)
> (4) I checked that on my system there is an older version of libasa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #16)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #14)
> - #if defined( AIX_PHYSADR_T_CHECK )
> - typedef struct __physadr_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #16)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #14)
> clang: error: argument unused during compilation: '-no-pie'
> [-We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #17)
> Iain, as I wrote below your changes seem not sufficient, I will recheck when
> I build your branch with gmp/mpfr/mpc built with dynamic_lookup, but it
> seems tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #17 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Iain, as I wrote below your changes seem not sufficient, I will recheck when I
build your branch with gmp/mpfr/mpc built with dynamic_lookup, but it seems
that there are some things where you missed the dyna
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #16 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #14)
> > If there is a git branch or so, I could also test it on my system with our
> > code whether this works as expecte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #14)
> If there is a git branch or so, I could also test it on my system with our
> code whether this works as expected.
Here you go - this is config.{sub, guess}, libt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #14 from Jürgen Reuter ---
If there is a git branch or so, I could also test it on my system with our code
whether this works as expected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #12)
> config.sub and config.guess are imported, unmodified, from upstream
> config.git.
thanks I will try to do that and test it over the next days (I've be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97865
--- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
config.sub and config.guess are imported, unmodified, from upstream
config.git.
libtool has lots of local changes, hopefully all of them submitted
upstream but maybe not and maybe some no
22 matches
Mail list logo
