[Bug target/96327] Inefficient increment through pointer to volatile on x86

2020-07-30 Thread paulmckrcu at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96327 --- Comment #6 from Paul McKenney --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5) > I don't think bug 3506 has been fixed (its status seems wrong to me). But > don't worry, there are several other duplicates that still have status NEW > (bug 50677

[Bug target/96327] Inefficient increment through pointer to volatile on x86

2020-07-30 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96327 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- I don't think bug 3506 has been fixed (its status seems wrong to me). But don't worry, there are several other duplicates that still have status NEW (bug 50677 for instance). This is a sensible enhancement requ

[Bug target/96327] Inefficient increment through pointer to volatile on x86

2020-07-26 Thread paulmckrcu at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96327 --- Comment #4 from Paul McKenney --- Bug 3506 has since been fixed, at least for the example shown in this bug report, as you can see if you look at the godbolt, which shows that both compilers generate a single addl instruction, which is exactl

[Bug target/96327] Inefficient increment through pointer to volatile on x86

2020-07-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96327 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/96327] Inefficient increment through pointer to volatile on x86

2020-07-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96327 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Keywords|