https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96247
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96247
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d60758c74af849539f5dd71a8456eea954c0f674
commit r11-2368-gd60758c74af849539f5dd71a8456eea954c0f674
Author: Hu Jiangping
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96247
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96247
--- Comment #2 from hujp ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> not sure if that's sensible or if instead zero should be rejected. Note
> x86_64 behaves the same so it's probably better to adjust the documentation
> to reflect the im
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96247
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.0
Keywords|
