[Bug target/95964] AArch64 arm_neon.h arithmetic functions lack appropriate attributes

2021-08-20 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95964 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- There are some lingering aarch64-simd-builtins.def entries that use “, ALL”, so I think we should keep this open until they've all been converted. The testcase was just an example, rather than

[Bug target/95964] AArch64 arm_neon.h arithmetic functions lack appropriate attributes

2021-08-12 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95964 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/95964] AArch64 arm_neon.h arithmetic functions lack appropriate attributes

2021-02-10 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95964 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-02-10 Ever confirm

[Bug target/95964] AArch64 arm_neon.h arithmetic functions lack appropriate attributes

2020-06-29 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95964 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > You could use fnspec attributes to improve things but of course open-coding > those as GIMPLE is preferable (last resort is to "fold" the calls to

[Bug target/95964] AArch64 arm_neon.h arithmetic functions lack appropriate attributes

2020-06-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95964 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- You could use fnspec attributes to improve things but of course open-coding those as GIMPLE is preferable (last resort is to "fold" the calls to GIMPLE sequences as powerpc does for select builtins).