https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
Will Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
Will Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #19 from Will Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Will Schmidt
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eba1113dbdf4b1d0d88755b2538327a1d09837b3
commit r8-10362-geba1113dbdf4b1d0d88755b2538327a1d09837b3
Author: Will Schmidt
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #16 from Will Schmidt ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #15)
> (In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #14)
> > (In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #13)
> > > Created attachment 48871 [details]
> > > proposed patch
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #14)
> (In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #13)
> > Created attachment 48871 [details]
> > proposed patch
> >
> > Attached patch appears sufficient to resolve t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #14 from Will Schmidt ---
(In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #13)
> Created attachment 48871 [details]
> proposed patch
>
> Attached patch appears sufficient to resolve the issue on the 970 based box
> I have access to.
Mikael,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #13 from Will Schmidt ---
Created attachment 48871
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48871&action=edit
proposed patch
Attached patch appears sufficient to resolve the issue on the 970 based box I
have access to.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #12 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #11)
> At some point in the past, GCC used to disable some instruction patterns
> depending on whether the binutils you're building against supports those
> instru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #11 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #9)
> binutils-2.23.88.0.1-13.fc20.ppc64
>
> I can build a recent binutils release and retry the gcc-8 bootstrap with
> that tomorrow. But since gcc-9/10/11 all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #10 from Will Schmidt ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> So what is the instruction / builtin / anything where it fails?
I've managed to recreate the altivec_init_builtins ICE issue on a yellowdog
box. (4-core 97
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #7)
> I've tried many 32-bit builds, but cannot reproduce the error. I tried with
> top of the releases/gcc-8 branch, using releases/gcc-8 branch at commit
> 09f22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> > I can help you build a default32 gcc if just adding -m32 to your
> > compile doesn't ICE on the test case.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #4)
> I can help you build a default32 gcc if just adding -m32 to your
> compile doesn't ICE on the test case.
I should mention, it's not as easy as just configuring w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
--- Comment #3 from Will Schmidt ---
Couldn't duplicate on P8/BE. I still have a couple builds going to see if I
can duplicate elsewhere.
I see "--with-cpu=default32 " in the config string. Is this an older hardware
platform?
thanks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95952
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||willschm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
17 matches
Mail list logo
