https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93269
--- Comment #4 from Jan Kratochvil ---
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93269
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93269
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is implementation defined area. And is documented. Neither is clang or
gcc is wrong. Now I dont know where clang it is documented but I posted where
gcc behavior is documented. So closing as invalid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93269
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-9.2.0/gcc/Arrays-and-pointers-implementation.html#Arrays-and-pointers-implementation
